T. Tsurumachi, M. Hayashi & O. Takeichi
Department of Endodontics, Nihon University School of Dentistry, Tokyo, Japan
To describe the clinical management of an unusual dens invaginatus type 2.
A case of dens invaginatus in a maxillary lateral incisor with a periapical lesion is reported. The patient presented with pain and localized swelling. Despite the complex anatomy and diagnosis of dens invaginatus , non-surgical root canal treatment was performed successfully.
Key learning points.
• Dens invaginatus may be presented in many forms, and the aetiology of this phenomenon is not fully understood.
• Due to abnormal anatomical configuration, dens invaginatus presents technical difficulties in its clinical management.
• Non-surgical root canal treatment can be performed successfully.
Dens invaginatus is a developmental malformation resulting from invagination of the tooth crown or root before calcification has occurred. The presumed aetiology of this phenomenon has been related either to focal growth retardation or focal growth stimulation, or to localized external pressure in certain areas of the tooth bud (Shafer et al . 1983). The condition may occur in any deciduous or permanent tooth. The permanent maxillary incisors are the most frequently involved teeth (Bimstein & Shteyer 1976). Radiographically this anomaly demonstrates a radiopaque invagination, equal in density to enamel, extending from the cingulum into the root canal (Gotoh et al . 1979). The defects may vary in size and shape from a loop-like, pearshaped or slightly radiolucent structure to a severe form resembling a ‘tooth within a tooth’. The classification of Oehlers (1957) is as follows:
- Type 1; an enamel invagination in the crown only.
- Type 2; an enamel-lined invagination that invades the root but remains confined within it as a blind sac, and may communicate with the dental pulp.
- Type 3; an invagination that extends from the crown to the apex.
An early diagnosis of such malformations is crucial. Due to abnormal anatomical configuration, an invaginated tooth presents technical difficulties in its clinical management. Various techniques for treating dens invaginatus have been reported, including conservative restorative treatment (de Sousa & Bramante 1998), non-surgical root canal treatment (Hosey & Bedi 1996), endodontic surgery (Bolanos et al . 1988), intentional replantation (Lindner et al . 1995) and extraction. The purpose of the present article is to describe a case of apical periodontitis associated with a tooth containing a dens invaginatus that healed successfully after non-surgical root canal treatment.
A 10-year-old girl was referred by her general dental practitioner because of pain and swelling from her maxillary right lateral incisor. The patient described an episode of recent severe throbbing pain over the past 2 days; there was no previous history of any signs or symptoms. The medical history was non-contributory. Clinical examination revealed that there was a swelling buccal to the lateral incisor (Fig. 1). The tooth was caries free but had an enamel projection in the centre of its lingual surface (Fig. 2). The gingival probing depths were within normal limits. The tooth was sensitive to percussion and failed to respond to electric pulp sensitivity testing. The adjacent teeth all responded within normal limits to percussion and sensitivity testing. A periapical radiograph demonstrated a radiolucent lesion in the mesial aspect of the apical third of the right lateral incisor (Fig. 3). A clinical diagnosis was established of dens invaginatus (Oehlers Type 2), necrotic pulp and acute apical abscess. Following isolation of the tooth with a rubber dam, the pulp chamber was opened and the invagination orifice located. When the invagination orifice was enlarged, the primary root canal was discovered in a more lingual position (Fig. 4). A radiograph with files in the root canals was obtained (Fig. 5).
Figure 1. Preoperative view of maxillary lateral incisor showing localized swelling.
Figure 2. Preoperative palatal view of maxillary lateral incisor. Note the large enamel projection.
Figure 3. Preoperative radiograph of maxillary lateral incisor showing dens invaginatus with periapical radiolucency.
Figure 4. Access opening demonstrating two distinct canal orifices.
Figure 5. K-files in both canals.
Figure 6. Radiograph immediately after obturation of primary root canal. No communication with invagination is evident.
Figure 7. Two-year follow-up radiograph of maxillary lateral incisor. Radiograph reveals a reduction in size of the radiolucent area.
The working lengths were established and recorded. The radiograph revealed a region of root resorption, with a lateral root perforation on the mesial surface. The invagination appeared to be calcified. There did not appear to be any communication between the primary root canal and the invagination. The canal system was debrided thoroughly and prepared by the step-back technique to a size 40. Copious irrigation with 2.6% sodium hypochlorite solution was used throughout the procedure. After drying the root canals with paper points, a cotton pellet was placed in the pulp chamber and the tooth was temporarily sealed with Cavit (ESPE, Seefeld, Germany). One week later, the patient returned without symptoms and the swelling had disappeared. The invagination was obturated by lateral condensation of gutta-percha and zinc oxide-eugenol sealer (Canals, Showa Yakuhin, Tokyo, Japan). The primary root canal was dried and filled with calcium hydroxide paste. Cotton wool and Cavit were placed in the access opening. The patient returned after 3 months, and the primary root canal was obturated using an injection-moulded thermoplasticized gutta-percha delivery system (Obtura II, Obtura Corp., Fenton, MO, USA) and zinc oxide-eugenol sealer. A postoperative radiograph was taken (Fig. 6). The patient was recalled periodically and healing was uneventful. The recall radiograph at 2 years showed osseous repair; the patient remained asymptomatic (Fig. 7).
Bimstein E, Shteyer A (1976) Dilated type of dens invaginatus in the permanent dentition: report of a case and review of the literature. Journal of Dentistry for Children 43, 410–3.
Bolanos OR, Martell B, Morse DR (1988) A unique approach to the treatment of a tooth with dens invaginatus. Journal of Endodontics 14, 315–7.
Budd CS, Weller RN, Kulild JC (1991) A comparison of thermoplasticized injectable gutta-percha obturation techniques. Journal of Endodontics 17, 260–4.
Byström A, Claesson R, Sundqvist G (1985) The antibacterial effect of camphorated paramonochlorophenol, camphorated phenol and calcium hydroxide in the treatment of infected root canals. Endodontics and Dental Traumatology 1, 170–5.
Gotoh T, Kawahara K, Imai K, Kishi K, Fujiki Y (1979) Clinical and radiographic study of dens invaginatus. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine and Oral Pathology 48, 88–91.
Gutmann JL (1993) Adaptation of injected thermoplasticized gutta-percha in the absence of the dentinal smear layer. International Endodontic Journal 26, 87–92.
Heithersay GS (1975) Calcium hydroxide in the treatment of pulpless teeth with associated pathology. Journal of the British Endodontic Society 8, 74–93.
Hosey MT, Bedi R (1996) Multiple dens invaginatus in two brothers. Endodontics and Dental Traumatology 12, 44–7.
Lindner C, Messer HH, Tyas MJ (1995) A complex treatment of dens invaginatus. Endodontics and Dental Traumatology 11, 153–5.
Oehlers FAC (1957) Dens invaginatus (dilated composite odontome). 1. Variations of the invagination process and associated anterior crown forms. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine and Oral Pathology 10, 1204–18.
Shafer WG, Hine MK, Levy BM , eds. (1983) Developmental disturbances of oral and paraoral structures. In: A Textbook of Oral Pathology, 4th edn. Philadelphia, USA: W.B.Saunders Co., 2–58.
de Sousa SM, Bramante CM (1998) Dens invaginatus: treatment choices. Endodontics and Dental Traumatology 14, 152–8.