Article Options


Advanced Search

This service is provided on D[e]nt Publishing standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy. To enquire about a licence to reproduce material from and/or JofER, click here.
This website is published by D[e]nt Publishing Ltd, Phoenix AZ, US.
D[e]nt Publishing is part of the specialist publishing group Oral Science & Business Media Inc.

Creative Commons License

Recent Articles RSS:
Subscribe to recent articles RSS
or Subscribe to Email.

Blog RSS:
Subscribe to blog RSS
or Subscribe to Email.

Azerbaycan Saytlari

 »  Home  »  Endodontic Articles 5  »  Bacterial and fungal microleakage of AH26 and AH Plus root canal sealers
Bacterial and fungal microleakage of AH26 and AH Plus root canal sealers
Results - Discussion - References.

Leakage through the samples varied from 14 to 87 days. All positive controls exhibited bacterial and fungal leakage within 72 h, whilst the broth in lower chambers used for negative controls remained clear throughout the test period. There was no statistically significant difference in leakage amongst the four experimental groups (2 – 1.06, P = 0.787).
Descriptive results for Mantel scores in the four experimental groups are shown in Table 1.
The leakage rate is shown in Figure 2: the percentage of specimens without leakage was uniform for all four groups and no particular intervals of risk were detected.
Biochemical analysis of turbid broth from the apical chambers showed presence of either Streptococcus mutans and Streptococcus mitis, or a mixture of Streptococcus spp. with Lactobacillus acidophilus and/or Prevotella melaninogenica.

Table 1. Descriptive statistic for Mantel scores for four experimental groups.

Descriptive statistic for Mantel scores for four experimental groups

Figure 2. Percentage of specimens without leakage during the experimental period in the four experimental groups.

Percentage of specimens without leakage during the experimental period in the four experimental groups

Both sealers allowed leakage of bacteria and C. albicans during the experimental period. Forty-five per cent of the samples sealed with AH26 leaked bacteria, and 60% leaked C. albicans, whilst amongst the samples sealed with AH Plus, 50% leaked bacteria and 55% leaked C. albicans. There were no statistically significant differences amongst the groups regarding the leakage times and percentages.
Moshonov et al. (1995), in their study of leakage with Staphyloccocus epidermidis in samples sealed with AH26, Roth 801 and Ketac Endo, showed that only two samples with AH26 leaked. Chailertvanitkul et al. (1996a), who used Streptococcus sanguis, found leakage in 16 of 20 samples, whilst the results of our study show leakage in nine of 20 samples sealed with AH26. A number of factors could explain the differences in the results, such as instrumentation technique, obturation technique, the type of microorganisms used, experimental design, and the nature of the irrigant to which the canal was exposed (Chailertvanitkul et al. 1996b).
The number of microorganisms that had caused turbidity was not measured as the purpose was only to prove that some bacteria and yeasts were capable of penetrating root canal fillings. The fact that in some specimens only one microorganism could leak and cause turbidity and in another case more microrganisms could penetrate through the root filling was not considered. However, partial simulation of the complex and dynamic nature of the oral flora was possible by using a mixture of bacterial species, which were changed in the upper chambers every 7 days.
The bacteria most often isolated from the turbid broth were Streptococcus mutans and Streptococcus mitis, whilst Lactobacillus acidophilus and Prevotella melaninogenica were less common and only in combination with Streptococcus spp. Also, Chailertvanitkul et al. (1997) reported that no single Prevotella intermedia sp. alone penetrated through the experimental teeth into the apical chamber. They attributed higher penetration of anaerobic streptococci in comparison with Prevotella intermedia to their smaller size.
The similarity between the leakage of bacteria and fungi in samples sealed with both sealers leads to the conclusion that C. albicans has at least the same capability to penetrate through the sealed root canal as the bacteria. Sen et al. (1997) found that growing hyphae have a tendency to follow cracks and penetrate into dental tubules and this could explain the leakage of C. albicans. Further investigation, both in vitro and in vivo, is needed to establish possible clinical risks of fungal infection.


Chailertvanitkul P, Saunders WP, Mackenzie D (1996a) The effect of smear layer on microbial coronal leakage of guttapercha root fillings. International Endodontic Journal 29, 242- 8.
Chailertvanitkul P, Saunders WP, Mackenzie D (1996b) An assessment of microbial coronal leakage in teeth root filled with gutta-percha and three different sealers. International Endodontic Journal 29, 387-92.
Chailertvanitkul P, Saunders WP, Mackenzie D (1997) Coronal leakage in teeth root-filled with gutta-percha and two different sealers after long-term storage. Endodontics and Dental Traumatology 13, 82-7.
DeGee AJ, Wu M-K, Wesselink PR (1994) Sealing properties of Ketac-Endo glass ionomer cement and AH26 root canal sealers. International Endodontic Journal 27, 239-44.
Imura N, Otani SM, Campos MJA, Jardim EG Jr, Zuolo ML (1997) Bacterial penetration through temporary restorative materials in root-canal-treated teeth in vitro. International Endodontic Journal 30, 381-5.
Koch MJ (1999) Formaldehyde release from root-canal sealers: influence of method. International Endodontic Journal 32, 10- 6.
Leonardo MR, Silva LAB, Almeida WA, Utrilla LS (1999) Tissue response to an epoxy resin-based root canal sealer. Endodontics and Dental Traumatology 15, 28-32.
Limkangwalmonkol S, Burtscher P, Abbot PV, Sandler AB, Bishop BM (1991) A comparative study of the apical leakage of four root canal sealers and laterally condensed gutta-percha. Journal of Endodontics 13, 109-12.
Mantel N (1967) Ranking procedures for arbitrarily restricted observations. Biometrics 23, 65-78.
Miletib I, Anib I, Pezelj-Ribarib S, Jukib S (1999) Leakage of five root canal sealers. International Endodontic Journal 32, 415-8.
Moshonov J, Shuping G, ?rstavik D, Broderius CA, Crawford JJ (1995) Bacterial leakage along root fillings with different sealers in vitro (Abstract 717). Journal of Dental Research 74, 101.
Nair PNR, Sj?gren U, Krey G, Kahnberg K-E, Sundqvist G (1990) Intraradicular bacteria and fungi in root filled, asymptomatic human teeth with therapy-resistant periapical lesions: a longterm light and electron microscopic follow up study. Journal of Endodontics 16, 580-8.
Nguyen NT (1991) Obturation of the root canal system. In: Cohen S, Burns RC, eds Pathways of the Pulp, 5th edn. St Louis, MO, USA: CV Mosby, 199-210.
Rossomando KJ, Wendt SL Jr (1995) Thermocycling and dwell times in microleakage evaluation for bonded restorations. Dental Materials 11, 47-51.
Saunders WP, Saunders EM (1994) Coronal leakage as a cause of failure in root canal therapy: a review. Endodontics and Dental Traumatology 10, 105-8.
Sen BH, Safavi KE, Sp?ngberg LS (1997) Colonization of Candida albicans on cleaned human dental hard tissues. Archives of Oral Biology 42, 513-20.
Torabinejad M, Ung B, Kettering JD (1990) In vitro bacterial penetration of coronally unsealed endodontically treated teeth. Journal of Endodontics 16, 566-9.
Waltimo TMT, ?rstavik D, Sir?n EK, Haapasalo MPP (1999) In vitro susceptibility of Candida albicans to four disinfectants and their combinations. International Endodontic Journal 32, 421-9.
Wu M-K, Wesselink PR, Boersma J (1995) A 1-year follow-up study on leakage of four root canal sealers at different thicknesses. International Endodontic Journal 28, 185-9.