Article Options
Categories


Search


Advanced Search



This service is provided on D[e]nt Publishing standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy. To enquire about a licence to reproduce material from endodonticsjournal.com and/or JofER, click here.
This website is published by D[e]nt Publishing Ltd, Phoenix AZ, US.
D[e]nt Publishing is part of the specialist publishing group Oral Science & Business Media Inc.

Creative Commons License


Recent Articles RSS:
Subscribe to recent articles RSS
or Subscribe to Email.

Blog RSS:
Subscribe to blog RSS
or Subscribe to Email.


Azerbaycan Saytlari

 »  Home  »  Endodontic Articles 6  »  A laboratory study of the effect of calcium hydroxide mixed with iodine or electrophoretically activated copper on bacterial viability in dentinal tubules
A laboratory study of the effect of calcium hydroxide mixed with iodine or electrophoretically activated copper on bacterial viability in dentinal tubules
Discussion - References.



Discussion.
Microorganisms in dentinal tubules may constitute a reservoir from which root canal and surrounding tissue infection and reinfection may occur. Treatment strategies designed to eliminate this reservoir should include agents that can penetrate the dentinal tubules and destroy these microorganisms, since they are located beyond the host defense mechanism, and out of reach of systemically administered antimicrobial agents. The present study evaluated the ability of intracanal medicaments to disinfect dentinal tubules leading from the root-canal space. For this purpose, cylindrical root specimens prepared from bovine teeth were used in anin vitro model of dentinal tubule infection (Haapasalo & Grstavik 1987). We modified this experimental model slightly to obtain additional quantitative information.
Calcium hydroxide (CH) has a lasting antibacterial activity in the root-canal space due to its high pH (Fuss et al.1989,1996). However, CH has poor solubility and its bactericidal effect on penetration into the dentinal tubules is unsatis factory (Haapasalo & Grstavik 1987).
Safavi et al. (1990) have shown that IKI penetrates into the dentinal tubules from a distance and kills bacteria in vitro. However, the duration of its antimicrobial efficiency is short (Engstrom1958); it is expected to remain active from 1 to 3 days depending on the rate of fluid exchange through the apical foramen (Moller 1966). In the present study, the use of IKI combined with CH proved to be more effective in dentinal tubules than pure CH. The use of this combination is especially important in root canals with complex anatomy where packing CH is complicated or impossible.
Molander et al. (1999) tested the activity of CH in the root canal following pretreatment with 5% IKI for 3-7 days; CH had no increased antimicrobial effect following such pretreatment. They suggested that the smear layer should be removed and the IKI mixed with a vehicle. This could enhance its antibacterial effect in the dentinal tubules and increase its duration of activity. In the present study, CH was used as a vehicle for the IKI and the smear layer was removed. This may explain the significantly better effect in the dentinal tubules compared to the former study. In a pilot test, there were no significant changes in pH values of CH paste following the addition of iodine (pH >12.5).
In this in vitro model, the best results were obtained with the addition of copper to CH and with the use of an electric current, according to the method described by Knappwost (1993). The depth of complete disinfection was at least 500 mm, which is superior to other medicaments. It is generally accepted that the choice of an intracanal medicament should balance antibacterial potency with tissue toxicity, a balance that is often difficult to achieve because medicaments that are bactericidal, usually exhibit some toxicity to mammalian cells (Spangberg1990). Coppermay be toxic to the periradicular tissues, therefore, its clinical use should be questioned and limited. In addition, electrodes which do not penetrate to the root-end (apex) as described by Knappwost (1993), are limited in their effectiveness at the most important site, the apical delta.

References.

American Associationof Endodontists (1998) Glossary. Contemporary Terminology for Endodontics, 6th edn.
Bechelli C, Zecchi Orlandini S, Colafranceschi M (1999) Scanning electron microscope study on the efficacy of root canal wall debridement of hand versus Light speed instrumentation. International Endodontic Journal 32, 484-93.
Bolanos OR, Jensen JR (1980) Scanning electron microscope comparisons of the efficacy of various methods of root canal preparation. Journal of Endodontics 6, 815-22.
European Society of Endodontology (1994) Consensus report of the European Society of Endodontology on quality guidelines for endodontic treatment. International Endodontic Journal 27,115-24.
Gambarini G (1999) Shaping and cleaning the root canal system: a scanning electron microscopic evaluation of a new instrumentation and irrigationtechnique. Journal of Endodontics 25,800-3.
Haikel Y, Allemann C (1988) Effectiveness of four methods for preparing root canals: a scanning electron microscopic evaluation. Journal of Endodontics14, 340-5.
H lsmann M (2000) Entwicklung Einer Methodik Zur Standardisierten Uberprufung Verschiedener Aufbereitungsparameter und Vergleichende in-Vitro-Untersuchung Unterschiedlicher Systeme Zur Maschinellen Wurzelkanalaufbereitung (Habilitationsschrift). Gottingen, Germany: University of Gottingen. Hulsmann M, Rummelin C, Schafers F (1997) Root canal cleanliness after preparation with different endodontic handpieces and hand instruments: a comparative SEM investigation. Journal of Endodontics 23,301-6.
HulsmannM, Versumer J, SchadeM(2000) Acomparative study of Lightspeed, ProFile 0.04, Quantec and Hero 642. International Endodontic Journal 33,150 (abstract).
Kum K-Y, SpOngberg L, Cha BY, Il-Young J, Seung-Jong L, Chan- Young L (2000) Shaping ability of three ProFile rotary instrumentation techniques in simulated resin root canals. Journal of Endodontics 26,719-23. Mizrahi SJ, Tucker JW, Seltzer S (1975) A scanning electron microscopic study of the efficacy of various endodontic instruments. Journal of Endodontics1,324-33.
Nair PNR, Sjogren U, Krey G, Kahnberg KE, Sundqvist G (1990) Intraradicular bacteria and fungi in root-filled, asymptomatic human teeth with therapy-resistant periapical lesions: a long-term light and electron microscopic follow-up study. Journal of Endodontics16,580-8.
PetscheltA, Stumpf B, RaabW(1987) Tightness of root canal sealers with and without smear layer. Deutsche Zahnarztliche Zeitschrift 42,743-6.
Schafer E, Diez C, Hoppe W, Tepel J (in press) Roentgenographic investigation of frequency and degree of canal curvatures in human permanent teeth. Journal of Endodontics in press.
Schafer E, Lohmann D (2002) Efficiency of rotary nickeltitanium FlexMaster instruments compared with stainless steel hand K-Flexofile. Part 1. Shaping ability in simulated curved canals. International Endodontic Journal 35, 514-21.
Schafer E, Zapke K (2000) A comparative scanning electron microscopic investigation of the efficacy of manual and automated instrumentation of root canals. Journal of Endodontics 26, 660-4.
Schwarze T, GeurtsenW (1996) Comparative qualitative SEM study of automated vs. hand instrumentation of root canals. Deutsche Zahnarztliche Zeitschrift 51, 227-30.
SpOngberg L, Engstrom B, Langeland K (1973) Biological effects of dental materials. Part 3. Toxicity and antimicrobial effects on endodontic antiseptics in vitro. Oral Surgery 36, 856-71.
Thompson SA, Dummer PMH (1997) Shaping ability of ProFile .04 taper Series 29 rotary nickel-titanium instruments in simulated canals. Part 1 and 2. International Endodontic Journal 30,1-15.
Turkun M, Cengiz T (1997) The effects of sodium hypochlorite and calcium hydroxide on tissue dissolution and root canal cleanliness. International Endodontic Journal 30, 335-42.
West JD, Roane JB, Goerig AC (1994) Cleaning and shaping the root canal system. In: Cohen S, Burns RC, eds. Pathways of the Pulps,6th edn. St. Louis, MO, USA: Mosby.179-218.
Wu MK,WesselinkPR (1995) Efficacy of three techniques in cleaning the apical portion of curved root canals. OralSurgery 79, 492-6.
Yamada RS, Armas A, Goldman M, Lin PS (1983) A scanning electron microscopic comparison of high volume final flush with several irrigating solutions. Part 3. Journal of Endodontics 9, 137-42.