Virtually anyone who has visited a dentist in the last 20 years has
seen pictures of the inside of their mouth. Cameras ranging in type from
film, to video to today's digital photographic systems are a staple in
virtually every dental practice regardless of specialty. But 60 years
ago that wasn't the case, there was x-ray, but nothing that a patient
could relate to and say "That's my mouth, I see what the problem is and
how it effects me."
Over a half century ago, dentists began
searching for a photographic device that could put patients in the
dentist's shoes to see what they see. However, even with the popularity
of conventional film photography growing, there was still one huge road
block to taking dental pictures. There was no clear way to get light
from the camera's flash inside the dark cavern that is the mouth. While
the technology of close-up lenses had grown to the point where a camera
was capable of photographing a close-up picture of an intra-oral
subject, getting light into the mouth to take the picture was another
story. Traditionally cameras produced light from a source on the camera
body and this light projected out at a distance to illuminate the
subject. But with close-up photography, often the lens was inches from
the subject. This light projecting from the camera body could not
disperse fast enough to pass enough light deep inside the mouth.
Therefore, the concept of dental photography was limited to basically
facial photography.
This changed with Lester Dine's invention of
the Ring Flash in 1952. The Ring Flash, a circular flash that attached
to the end of the camera's lens, had the ability to pinpoint light
directly into the patient's mouth, providing full illumination from
external anteriors to posterior intra-oral quadrant pictures. This
invention revolutionized the concept of dentist/patient communication.
Now through photography, a patient could see what a dentist could see
and understand the importance of treatment. In addition photographs of
existing patients could be used to show patients potential before and
after scenarios as well as "worst case scenarios" should patient decide
against treatment. This invention meant photography could now be used as
a teaching tool, forever changing the way dentists were taught in
school and via continuing education. Developments in the field could be
documented photographically and included in slide presentations from
lectures creating the most visual teaching tool possible. The complete
dental record was forever changed.
Today's ring flash physically
differs very little from the original Ring design, to improve portrait
photography, an additional flash called a "Point Light" was added to the
Ring Flash system, allowing the user to choose between two distinct
flashes depending upon the photographic subject, ring for intra-orals,
point for facials. In addition a concept called TTL (through the lens)
flash metering was created. This concept allowed the camera to judge the
light around the subject through the lens, and to control the light
output based on this reading. This took the guesswork out of
photography. It made the process of taking a dental picture basically
three steps, look through the camera, focus, and take the picture. TTL
flash metering makes the flash output as consistent as possible.
As
the popularity of dental photography grew through the 1960's and into
the 1970's a limitation of 35mm film based photography became clear. The
doctor could take photographs while the patient was at their office,
but they couldn't review those photographs with them until the film was
developed. And with elements of human and mechanical error, as well as
inefficient film processing effecting the output of even the finest
dental photographer's work, there was no way to even insure that the
developed photos would accurately represent the case. There was a clear
need for immediate and accurate photographic results. This need
coincided with the invention of instant film cameras. While not the
quality of 35mm film, instant cameras offered the user the ability to
take a photograph and see results within a couple of minutes. The
cameras could actually take a picture and process it to special film
inside the camera. Lester Dine modified the first instant camera and
affixed lenses and a flash modification to the camera creating the
dental world's first instant photographic system. This device was
followed by other instant output cameras and created an entirely new way
for doctor's to educate patients.
In the 1980's computers
started to take a bigger role in the dental office, so did the desire of
dentists to computerize photography. The first foray into computerized
picture taking was with intra-oral video cameras. The video cameras were
revolutionary in many ways. The intra-oral video cameras were built
into wands small enough to fit into the patient's mouth. With video not
only could the patient see a photo of their case, but they could
actually see inside their mouth live, in real time. The dentist could
point the small video camera at a particular tooth or segment of the
mouth and discuss treatment plans. Plus, as computers became more
capable, the images could actually be imported into cosmetic imaging
programs and edited to show potential before and afters. With the art of
cosmetic dentistry growing and elective cosmetic procedures on the
rise, this form of imaging was instrumental in selling cases. Not only
could doctor's use photography to show patients before and after's of
other patients, but via computer imaging, they can actually show a
patient how potential changes could effect the way they look. This
concept has become so popular and widely marketed that today many
prospective patients not only enjoy seeing the potential before and
after picture, but will shop for doctors that offer this technology.
While
intra-oral video technology was certainly influential to the field of
photography, it was limited in several ways. First and foremost, like
instant print pictures, it lagged far behind 35mm film cameras in
quality. Second, video's integration with computers was cumbersome,
often requiring an elaborate video capturing system. Third, the video
systems were not portable and generally required a dedicated video image
space. They were also expensive.
Ultimately, the popularity of
intra-oral video cameras leveled off and were replaced by what many
consider the most important invention in dental photography since the
ring flash, Digital Photography. Digital picture taking combines the
best of all three of the previous photographic concepts, the quality of
35mm film, the speed of instant photography, and the computerized
integration of video. Digital cameras integrate easily with computers
by plugging directly into a computer USB port. And work seamlessly with
virtually all Windows and MAC imaging programs. When plugged into
computers most digital cameras are assigned drive letters and accessed
in the same manner CD-ROMs are accessed. Like film and instant cameras,
not all digital cameras will work intra-orally, but with the right
digital camera in hand, dentists possess an incredible tool.
The Importance of Photography to a Practice
The
old saying that a picture is worth a thousand words can be taken a step
further when it comes to dental photography, where a single photograph
can offer a virtually endless number of vital uses for a busy practice.
While type of practice and specialty will effect how images are used in
general, virtually all practices will certainly find endless uses for
photographs.
First and foremost photographs compliment patient
records. Photographs along with written description paint a complete
picture of a case. They serve as an ideal and descriptive way to
document the progress of a case from every angle and during every office
visit. Charting case progress, monitor everything from healing after
surgery to cancerous growths to cracks in fillings, and most
importantly, have a visual reference to all cases available in your
patient charts. The concept of digital photography enhances the ultimate
goal of many practices to move toward a paperless office. Digital
images can be added directly to practice management programs to make for
the ultimate patient record.
The use of digital images is endless, the following are a few of the most common applications...
Communication
with Insurance Companies- With insurance companies controlling how much
and when to pay and putting the burden of proof on procedures firmly in
the laps of the dentists, photographs present a clear description of
procedures. A series of case pictures along with a written description
is the most thorough way to gain insurance company compliance. With more
and more insurance companies moving to electronic communication, users
of digital cameras, can simply e-mail image and text in minutes. The use
of computer software to include images in letters, before and after
layouts or case descriptions, makes for a fast and effective way for a
doctor to present cases to insurance companies.
Dental
Laboratories- where a small discrepancy can make a big difference,
communicating the right shade, and description of a case to a dental lab
is essential. A clear photograph of the subject along with shade tab
information and case description is the most complete way to show off
cases to labs. Once again dental imaging software can be used both to
present a case to the lab and to show patient's potential results via
computer imaging.
Malpractice Suits-it's always said that truth is
the best defense. With photography, dentists have a clear and visual
explanation of a case, with before and afters, progress reports, and
treatment response, in the unlikely event a malpractice suit has to be
fought, photography will go a long way toward presenting the dentist's
side of the issue. The entire treatment process from first visit to
final result can be easily charted via picture taking.
Selling
Cases- One of the most interesting developments in dentistry has been
the growing popularity of cosmetic dentistry and elective procedures.
There's no way to deny it, photography helps sell cases. Whether it's
showing patients their own pictures, before and after's of previous
cases, or using cosmetic imaging software to simulate before and afters
the pictures you take makes the case seem "real" to the patient. By
combining a patient's pictures with before and afters of similar cases
or using the latest cosmetic imaging software to simulate potential
before and afters, any patient considering a cosmetic procedure will
have a very clear understanding of the benefits of treatment, the same
day they visit the doctor's office.
Choosing a digital camera
Digital
Photography is by far the most popular format of camera sold today. The
once popular 35mm and instant cameras have become a thing of the past.
With the ability to match the quality of film combined with the
immediate access of instant photography, digital picture taking truly
offers the best of both worlds. Digital images are produced in a
computer file format both MAC and Windows systems can readily
understand, and their interaction with computers is as simple as a
straight plug in to a USB port on a computer. Digital Images can be
transferred anywhere over the internet. They can be printed on virtually
any computer printer and they can be stored on CD's or DVD's for long
term access. A simple attachment from computer to digital projector
allows for immediate presentation for lecture, totally eliminating the
need for 35mm slides. In addition graphics can be combined with digital
slides to create an incredibly dynamic presentation.
Digital
Cameras also offer the ability to by-pass a computer completely. So for
the computer phobic user, the cameras can actually communicate directly
with photo printers to produce hard copy prints. Mimicking the output of
instant cameras, with one exception, if a user doesn't like a photo
they've taken, they can always re-take it prior to hard copy print.
While
the technology is new, the dilemma of finding a camera to photograph
intra-orally has not gotten any easier. There are hundreds of digital
cameras on the market for the general consumer, but less than a handful
will provide the range of intra-oral photography required by dentists.
The
limitation of over the counter digital cameras is in lens and lighting.
Most over the counter digital cameras don't have the close up
capability that dentists need, then those that do often don't provide
enough depth of field to see the entire close-up picture in focus.
An
even bigger hurdle to overcome is lighting. As was the case with 35mm
and instant cameras, intra-oral lighting is a major problem. The small
format over the counter digital cameras have built in flashes that
normally aren't capable of pinpointing light into the patients mouth,
nor can they meter the light output . The other option is Single Lens
Reflex digital cameras. These cameras offer the ability to add
additional lens and flashes much like 35mm cameras, to achieve the ideal
dental photographs. To the surprise and disappointment of many 35mm
camera users pre-existing manual focus macro lenses and ring flashes
generally do not transfer over to today's digital SLR's.
Fortunately,
there are digital camera solutions for dentists, and they come in the
form of both the small format digital cameras and the digital SLR
systems.
There are two very clear directions to go with
photography, for those looking for fast, simple, intra-oral picture
taking, the concept of small format digital cameras is very attractive.
Small format digitals generally weigh a pound or less and often can be
held with a single hand. These cameras are attractive to a dentist
looking for fast and easy photography. Knowledge of cameras and
photography in general is less important with these systems. Generally,
the user follows a live video screen on the back of the camera, uses a
telephoto zoom on the camera to gain macro close-up, then autofocuses
and takes the picture. Results are immediately displayed on the back of
the camera. With the small format camera like the Dine Digital
Solution, a camera that weighs less than a pound is modified to work as
an intra-oral camera. The camera is used from usually between 8 and 12
inches from the subject (the average SLR camera is used 4-6 inches from
the subject). This distance from the subject allows the light from the
camera time to disperse to fully illuminate the intra-oral subject to
the back of the mouth. The camera itself has been modified so it can
meter the flash and put out the right amount of light. For instance a
posterior quadrant photograph would require more light than an anterior
smile, the camera is capable of gauging appropriate light output and
adjusting accordingly.
The Single Lens Reflex cameras offer the
highest level of intra-oral picture taking. For those publishing,
lecturing, applying for academy accreditation this camera system will
best reflect ones dental work. The SLR film cameras look and feel like
the 35mm cameras of the past. They utilize either 105mm or 60mm macro
lenses as well as Ring and Point Flashes. The digital SLR's are capable
of TTL'ing the flash output for maximum consistency. The camera's
lenses can be used in manual focus allowing users to standardize their
photography with the ultimate goal of consistent before and after
photography.
The Single Lens Reflex cameras are larger and
heavier than their small format digital counterparts. They can be more
intimidating to a user unfamiliar with cameras, however, the style and
concept of SLR photography has proved itself to me tried and true over
the last 50 years and with a period of practice, anyone in the office
can use these cameras.
Implementing Photography:
For
any practice that has never taken photographs before, implementing a
photographic plan can take a bit of work and staff member acceptance.
First, auxillaries have to understand and appreciate the importance of
dental photography. In addition understanding how to use their camera
and seeing the positive reaction patients have to pictures is essential.
Having time to use and practice with the camera is essential. One nice
advantage of digital photography is memory cards can be used to for
practiced, erased, and used again, so there's no costs involved with
practicing with digital cameras.
Putting your dental camera to use:
The
basic dental photographer's goal is to accomplish a simple series of
intra-oral and extra-oral photos, an anterior, lateral, occlusal using a
mirror, facial, profile, and intra-oral quadrant. It's reasonable to
expect one new to taking pictures to be able to take this series of
photos within a day or two of purchasing a dental camera system. The
newest cameras go a long way to simplifying picture taking by
controlling flash output internally. This concept called "Through the
Lens" (TTL) Flash Metering revolutionized photography by taking the
guess work out of picture taking, allowing the camera to gauge light in
the room or in the case of dental photography the light inside the
mouth, and adjust accordingly. In addition some single lens reflex
cameras are equipped with standardization guides on their lenses to show
users exactly where the lens should be set for the different popular
dental pictures.
Beyond learning how to use the camera,
competency with two essential tools for dental photography are
important. The intra-oral mirror, and cheek retractors work hand in hand
with the camera. The cheek retractors are designed to pull the cheeks
away from their natural position so that they do not block the teeth and
gums. The retractors allow full access for the flash to reach the
posterior of the mouth. The intra-oral mirror works to allow the camera
to photograph subjects that would be difficult or impossible to access
by photography directly into the subject. An upper or lower arch
photograph for instance, is take by placing a mirror on the opposite
side of the arch. The mirror can then be angled to reflect the full arch
above or below it. The photographer would then focus and take pictures
off of the reflected surface.