|
E. V. Cruz, Y. Shigetani, K. Ishikawa, K. Kota, M. Iwaku & H. E. Goodis Department of Operative Dentistry and Endodontics, Niigata University Faculty of Dentistry, Niigata City, Japan. Manila Central University College of Dentistry, Manila, Philippines. Division of Endodontics, University of California San Francisco School of Dentistry, California, USA.
Aim. The aim of this study was to compare the sealing abilities of Fermin and Canseal with the more popular temporary coronal filling materials, Cavit and Caviton
Conclusion. Amongst the four materials tested, Fermin was observed to provide a consistently tight seal even after being subjected to thermal and load cycling procedures. It was followed by Caviton and then Cavit. This study also showed that thermal cycling procedures seemed to affect the sealing ability of certain types of temporary endodontic filling materials whilst load cycling did not. These results further stress the importance of correctly placing a sufficient thickness of temporary filling material in endodontic access cavities to ensure a tight seal. Additional studies may be needed to verify the quality of seal provided by these materials for prolonged periods.
|